|
North of London | But I am not proposing any hypothesis I have never seen any evidence to support the 'hypothesis' of a super natural being.
In the scientific way of doing things the hypothesis is a description to explain something that naturally occurs and then by testing and studying the results it is either proven or not proven to be true.
The problem with the 'hypothesis' of a super natural being is there is no way to test for it as even you admit.
So is it a true hypothesis if you have no way of testing it or is it then just a story?
So yes we may think our hypothesis is correct but until it is proven correct it remains just a hypothesis and should not be accepted as fact.
So we remain either just believing or waiting for evidence before accepting it as true. | |
|
Adam and Eve they lived how long
