Chris 924 - 4/1/2014 12:50 OntarioCanuck - 4/1/2014 08:36 IF your hypothesis was true then why did this 'designer' not use the best parts for all. Why do humans not have eyes like cats so we do not trip over things in the dark? Why do fish not have lungs so they can breath out of the water? Why do foxes not have better legs so they can catch rabbits better? Why do humans not have litters of 6 or more babies at a time so they can populate the world quicker? Why did this designer not use the 'best' parts on all animals? to add to this list, why do we have an apendx ? we don't use it anymore to process raw meat it's closed off, but we use to, humans are slowly evolving it out of there bodys. The designer did use the best parts for all creatures to fit into the environment and plan He placed them in. Each individual within the species is not a clone of the original of the species but a variation of it So why do we have an appendix if your evolution hypothesis is true? Why do newborn children have an unneeded appendix? Have you considered the fact (or is that simply an hypothesis?) that the environment has changed? Could that appendix STILL serve a function if in fact humans were again exposed the environment present at the time of our creation? Shoot, maybe the appendix is an internal antenna sending undetectable sound waves which repels dinosaurs ******* It makes as much sense as some "beliefs" science dreams up with their ever changing etch-a-sketches and photo shopped facts. Sorry to interrupt your holy day. Edited for addition in italics to say what I intended to say.
Edited by Gary Lyon 4/1/2014 14:47
| 
The "Noah" movie.......save your money
