Posted 5/22/2012 08:20 (#2392820 - in reply to #2392597) Subject: RE: Running over someone's pet./ no speed limit on a rural residential road
Central Minnesota
The point of the analogy wasn't saying both instances were the same. The point of the analogy was that the responsibility claim that the poster made was ridiculous, and I just was illustrating how ridiculous that situation would be for him to be blamed for the kid's mistake, was not at all implying they are the same situation.