AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (222) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Cyclo planter biggest shortcoming?
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
Sundance
Posted 6/11/2021 08:06 (#9053012 - in reply to #9052922)
Subject: RE: Cyclo planter biggest shortcoming?



West Central Minnesota
First 400 showed up here new in the early 70s, followed by another 400, then 800, and finally 955. Then a 1770 box showed up. Sure, spacing was better but yields didn't magically change to justify its existence and individual row boxes were a PITA. Never more happy to see a planter go down the road than that 1770. Would take a 955 today over a 1770 if I had to go back.

Your mileage may vary. Do not remove this disclaimer under penalty of law. For optimum performance and safety, please read these instructions carefully.

Void where prohibited. No representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the completeness, accuracy, fitness for a particular purpose, or utility of these materials or any information or opinion contained herein.

Prices slightly higher west of the Mississippi. All models over 18 years of age. No animals were harmed during the production of this product. Any resemblance to actual people, living or dead, or events, past, present or future, is purely coincidental. This product not to be construed as an endorsement of any product or company, nor as the adoption or promulgation of any guidelines, standards or recommendations.

Some names have been changed to protect the innocent. This product is meant for educational purposes only. Some assembly required. Batteries not included. Package sold by weight, not volume. Contents may settle during shipment. No user-serviceable parts inside. Use only as directed.

Do not eat. Not a toy.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)