|
| I was responding to this comment:
That is the point people have been making for weeks. By prolonging this you endanger the most vulnerable. The faster the strong get a taste an recover the sooner the elderly will be safe.
The above statement was implying that the reason people wanted the “strong” to go back to work was to build up immunity so that they will then protect the “weak” from infection. Previously, virtually every comment about wanting the “strong” to go back to work was for the sake of the economy, not for the sake of protecting the “weak”. Which is also what you just said. Even though the action would be the same, the reasons for taking that action are totally different. One is about the concern for the “weak”, the other is about the good of the economy.
Also, yes, it has been stated many times in these threads lately that the majority of the deaths will be people who are already near death and living on borrowed time already anyways. | |
|
COVID herd immunity vs survival of the fittest- big difference
