Viewing a thread - not looking good

Forums | Classifieds (13) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

not looking good	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format

Mudpie1971

Posted 5/20/2015 10:10 (#4581547 - in reply to #4581544)
Subject: RE: not looking good

Patience, Grasshopper...

not looking good - vickruse : 5/20/2015 10:08
- RE: not looking good - Mudpie1971 : 5/20/2015 10:10
  - RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 10:19
  - RE: not looking good - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 10:19
    - RE: not looking good - Mudpie1971 : 5/20/2015 10:22
  - RE: Patience, grasshopper....... - indeeppigfarmer : 5/20/2015 10:21
- RE: not looking good - indeeppigfarmer : 5/20/2015 10:19
  - RE: not looking good - Sat : 5/20/2015 10:35
    - RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 10:45
      - RE: not looking good - vailcat : 5/20/2015 11:26
        
        RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 11:36
        
        RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 11:49
- RE: not looking good - hoopsfarms : 5/20/2015 10:41
- RE: This probably was the year to .... - 1234 : 5/20/2015 11:14
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - clicker : 5/20/2015 11:51
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - white shadow : 5/20/2015 12:43
      - Insurance Will Not Cover COP Here - dmswil : 5/20/2015 13:24
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Wicksfield : 5/20/2015 16:51
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 11:52
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Sat : 5/20/2015 11:56
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - vailcat : 5/20/2015 12:04
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - LongKC : 5/20/2015 12:07
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - rich79 : 5/20/2015 13:25
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 13:46
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - ruralHusker : 5/20/2015 13:58
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - jtpfarm : 5/20/2015 14:00
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - ruralHusker : 5/20/2015 15:34
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Illinois Steve : 5/20/2015 14:30
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - cainfarmer : 5/20/2015 17:37
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - McHusker : 5/20/2015 17:57
  - Just stay the course and don't panic - redoak : 5/20/2015 11:57
    - RE: Just stay the course and don't panic - HeyhayJCM : 5/20/2015 13:23
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Chad H : 5/20/2015 14:37
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 14:57
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Chad H : 5/20/2015 15:48
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 16:12
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 19:24
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:21
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:37
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:40
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:43
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:53
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 19:26
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - rich79 : 5/20/2015 19:44
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:39
        last year was a perfect growing year?????? - Tara Farms : 5/20/2015 22:09
        
        RE: last year was a perfect growing year?????? - turdypointbuck : 5/21/2015 11:14
        RE: last year was a perfect growing year?????? - 429 : 5/21/2015 12:02
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - cornstalk : 5/20/2015 16:48
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 14:45
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - partimer : 5/20/2015 21:01
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - kst1 : 5/21/2015 09:39
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - BShauler : 5/21/2015 10:36
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - HeyhayJCM : 5/21/2015 11:35

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)