Viewing a thread - not looking good

Forums | Classifieds (6) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

not looking good	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format

ruralHusker

Posted 5/20/2015 13:58 (#4581871 - in reply to #4581829)
Subject: RE: This probably was the year to ....

West of Lincoln a little bit

The only difference I see is that what goes UP must come DOWN.

What is DOWN can stay there as long as it freaking wants to. Gravity (market forces) says it never has to go up again. That sucks.

not looking good - vickruse : 5/20/2015 10:08
- RE: not looking good - Mudpie1971 : 5/20/2015 10:10
  - RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 10:19
  - RE: not looking good - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 10:19
    - RE: not looking good - Mudpie1971 : 5/20/2015 10:22
  - RE: Patience, grasshopper....... - indeeppigfarmer : 5/20/2015 10:21
- RE: not looking good - indeeppigfarmer : 5/20/2015 10:19
  - RE: not looking good - Sat : 5/20/2015 10:35
    - RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 10:45
      - RE: not looking good - vailcat : 5/20/2015 11:26
        
        RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 11:36
        
        RE: not looking good - LongKC : 5/20/2015 11:49
- RE: not looking good - hoopsfarms : 5/20/2015 10:41
- RE: This probably was the year to .... - 1234 : 5/20/2015 11:14
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - clicker : 5/20/2015 11:51
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - white shadow : 5/20/2015 12:43
      - Insurance Will Not Cover COP Here - dmswil : 5/20/2015 13:24
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Wicksfield : 5/20/2015 16:51
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 11:52
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Sat : 5/20/2015 11:56
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - vailcat : 5/20/2015 12:04
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - LongKC : 5/20/2015 12:07
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - rich79 : 5/20/2015 13:25
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 13:46
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - ruralHusker : 5/20/2015 13:58
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - jtpfarm : 5/20/2015 14:00
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - ruralHusker : 5/20/2015 15:34
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Illinois Steve : 5/20/2015 14:30
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - cainfarmer : 5/20/2015 17:37
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - McHusker : 5/20/2015 17:57
  - Just stay the course and don't panic - redoak : 5/20/2015 11:57
    - RE: Just stay the course and don't panic - HeyhayJCM : 5/20/2015 13:23
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Chad H : 5/20/2015 14:37
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 14:57
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - Chad H : 5/20/2015 15:48
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 16:12
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 19:24
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:21
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:37
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:40
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:43
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - Norstman : 5/20/2015 20:53
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 19:26
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - rich79 : 5/20/2015 19:44
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - 190xt : 5/20/2015 20:39
        last year was a perfect growing year?????? - Tara Farms : 5/20/2015 22:09
        
        RE: last year was a perfect growing year?????? - turdypointbuck : 5/21/2015 11:14
        RE: last year was a perfect growing year?????? - 429 : 5/21/2015 12:02
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - cornstalk : 5/20/2015 16:48
  - RE: This probably was the year to .... - RealFarmer : 5/20/2015 14:45
    - RE: This probably was the year to .... - partimer : 5/20/2015 21:01
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - kst1 : 5/21/2015 09:39
      - RE: This probably was the year to .... - BShauler : 5/21/2015 10:36
        
        RE: This probably was the year to .... - HeyhayJCM : 5/21/2015 11:35

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)