|
North of London | Why do you think only mammals can give birth to live young?
Why do you think you need placenta to call it a live birth?
If the young is live when born and does not have to incubate over a period of time then that is a live birth.
If a mountain skink came back to sea level and slowly started to develop the ability of laying eggs then that would be evolution from live birthing to egg laying.
No need to call it reverse since it would be changing to what is most beneficial in that environment and maybe it would not change.
If I have not posted about whales then google it and check out I think Berkley as one with a good description.
Lots of others that show you how whales evolved from land mammals to water mammals and note how they still have some parts of their rear legs which of course they do not need or use any more.
The changes to cows and corn in 100 years is of course not enough to change the species but look at the changes in corn over the last 8,000 years or so.
It is no where near the plant it was then because of evolution forced by man.
You are trying to be 'blind' to the obvious because it does not fit into your preconceived ideas taught since you were a child by a religion which refuses to acknowledge science.
If you open your eyes and look at the world without the old indoctrinated fallacies you will start to see evolution when you have to change sprays to kill resistant weeds or need super duty antibiotics to fight a resistant strain of infection. | |
|
The "Noah" movie.......save your money
