AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (67) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

No-till vs Strip-till
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Crop TalkMessage format
 
Iceman56
Posted 1/24/2018 07:43 (#6527455 - in reply to #6525457)
Subject: RE: No-till vs Strip-till


SE South Dakota
KDD - 1/23/2018 10:49

Nothing against strip till, except on our more rolling fields it didn't work very well for us. Too much erosion down the row. Sold the bar and went back to either actual no-till, or vertical/reduced tillage. Still have erosion in the swales, but no longer in every row on the hills.

There is a fair bit of strip till done in the county just to the north of us, but most of the farmland there is fairly flat. Works much better there from what I can see.

Regarding fertilizer in a strip: I cannot see the return on a $200k machine to strip till and put fertilizer down on ground that is "pretty fertile right now". I do not agree with those who say you can cut application rates below removal rates by putting it in a strip. Just is not true in the long run. The crop will use what it will use no matter if in a strip or not. Can you cut rate short term? Sure. But you can do that without putting the fertilizer in a strip. Result is the same...eventually you will deplete soil nutrients to some degree, and have to replace them. Replace them each year or two with broadcast, and save the investment of strip fertilizer machinery, and use it to buy more fertilizer, or bank it.


This is one of the reasons that got me thinking if banding in strip would benefit me much, because we have such high fertile soils right now, the plant is only gonna take up so much. I would think with 200bu yield goal the crop wouldn't be starving any with what is in the soil right now.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)