CIL | Successful farming finally took up an issue outside their “top shops” in an attempt to be journalists. I’d give the article a complete face plant rating.
Sounds like it was written by someone from Bayer...
“New formulations of dicamba with lower volatility than current products are being evaluated and are projected to be in the marketplace in the future, pending regulatory approvals. These formulations are expected to be used in XtendFlex soybean (resistant to dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate). Significant reductions in volatility and better drift management practices could greatly reduce risks associated with dicamba, and these formulations probably should be mandated for use on corn, and for other dicamba uses where appropriate.”
They claim this article was a "discussion" between two weed scientists and yet it is written in one voice with no attribution. There are so many things stated in this article that are conflict with one another...and yet it feels like a sales pitch at the end for the newer forms of dicamba.
I’d call it a false flag op.
Edited by WTF2014 7/10/2020 23:39
|
dicamba injury
