Nebraska aka the boondocks | You are making facts to fit your conclusion. Was that the courts conclusion? No. Did the court conclude the volatility was the same? Even if it were, then spraying extendimax in a 3 mph wind with restrictions, should be at least as safe as spraying Clarity in a 10mph wind, with none, and based on the specific gravity, perhaps safer. The point was brought up to me today by someone from one of the defendants that, they approached this from the perspective that they at least wanted to protect dicamba use in corn, which in my opinion, was a completely wrong tactic, and will end up being a total loss of use of dicamba in the end. |
Only the facts mam
