Southeast Wisconsin | I've been working on our soil sampling to yield data and I have a few observations that I have questions on.
The soil data was taken on 2.5 ac grids and the samples were sent to Midwest labs. I've taken the maps and had the program (SMS basic) make zones based on the soil data and cut through the layers of the yield map from last season.
This is one field of soybeans pH to yield 7ph - 38.41 bu/ac - 3.4ac 6.6ph - 43.15 bu/ac - 17.9ac 6 ph - 49.35 bu/ac - 28.54ac 5.5ph - 54.81 bu/ac - 22.9ac 5.1ph - 52.7 bu/ac - 9.96ac
K to yield 235 ppm - 49.70bu/ac - 10ac 176.5 ppm - 54.21bu/ac - 27.5ac 142 ppm - 47.6 bu/ac - 33.45ac 114ppm - 43.89 bu/ac - 11ac
p1 to yield 63ppm - 54.78 bu/ac - 35.27ac 39.5 ppm - 48.21 bu/ac - 12.67ac 29.9 ppm - 46.57 bu/ac - 22.37ac 23 ppm - 41.1bu/ac - 12.5ac
p2 to yield 115ppm - 40 bu/ac - 3ac 85ppm - 56.57 bu/ac - 19ac 61ppm - 52.68 bu/ac - 20 ac 37 ppm - 45.34 bu/ac - 40 ac
After doing this analysis I am having a hard time seeing the coorelation between the optimum pH for soybeans (6.5-6.8) based on this fields data. The p1, p2, and k readings and yield are nice to see the coorelation because we are trying to get our soil levels up. Based on University of Wisconsin's rec's our p1 levels are excessive. They say you want your p1 to 25 ppm and anything over you won't see a yield increase. Well based on this we need to double that 25 to 50 ppm.
The same results are coming out of the corn fields also. Soing lower pH's having higher yields and p1 levels over 40 ppm showing much higher yields than the 25 ppm yields.
So basically how important is lime and getting your pH in the so called ideal range? When you look at your phos and K levels where do you want them for high quality crops that are looking to push yields? These soils are around 10-12 CEC about 65% cal, 25% mag and 3% K. |