AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (2) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Ivermectin over/mis-dose...
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> AgTalk CafeMessage format
 
havin’funfarming
Posted 6/15/2021 09:08 (#9059931 - in reply to #9059859)
Subject: RE: Ivermectin over/mis-dose...


CMN - 6/15/2021 08:21

What I find interesting, is the "study" that started the Ivomec prevention/cures covid-19 mantra, used a 100 times safe for human use labeled dose.

And, in other more recent controlled studies, we are finding out it takes a much larger dose of Ivomec than what is currently approved for human use for the drug to be effective in treating covid-19.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200427/Ivermectin-alone-not-usef...

The approved dose of ivermectin alone not useful in treating COVID-19

https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-t...

Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection.

Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20


I find the not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection statement interesting too...I thought that is the reason many people are rejecting the approved for emergency use by the FDA covid-19 vaccines?


I have no idea if the first study started at the “100 times the safe for human use LABELED dose” and I really don’t care because that in and of itself is actually irrelevant. The reason for that is because it is simply the initial study. Have people been dying from the “ivermectin” overdose in these studies? The answer is no, they haven’t. They have almost always been healthier afterwards actually.

Your next comment is similar in that you are claiming that ivermectin has to be administered in doses above CURRENTLY approved doses. That in no way means that the beneficial effect of ivermectin doesn’t occur at safe dosage levels. All it means is that it takes more than the currently approved dosage level. This type of recommended dosage change occurs quite often when they find new uses for old, proven to be safe, drugs.

Next, no, in general people are not rejecting the vaccine simply because it isn’t FDA approved. In general, people are rejecting the vaccine because it’s safety is not yet proven. Its safety is at best assumed, not proven. There is mounting evidence that their assumptions about its safety was wrong due to a lot of personal experiences that strongly suggest it isn’t safe.

When the FDA approval issue comes up it is almost always to bring in the legal argument that no one should be FORCED to take a non FDA approved vaccine. Be it to keep their job, fly on a plane, etc, etc. The FDA argument is brought in for legal reasons, not for personal reasons.

Almost all of your reasoning has the cause and effect backwards. You seem to think that a dosage of ivermectin isn’t safe until the FDA says it is. That is backwards. Ivermectin will be safe at whatever dosage that may be irregardless of what the FDA says. The most the FDA can do is be reactive and approve that dosage. In other words, what the FDA says has no effect on the true safe dosage.

The same goes for it not being approved for the treatment of any viral infection. Ivermectin will either work or it won’t for a viral infection irregardless of what the FDA says. Again, the most that the FDA can do is be reactive and approve it’s use for viral infections. In other words, what the FDA says has no effect on whether ivermectin works on viral infections.

Edited by havin’funfarming 6/15/2021 09:11
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)