|
E ND | HP in a fully hydrostatic machine is definitely interesting.
It seems like for the most part the drop from 82HP down to 74HP was a non-issue until....you ask everything of that machine. No single function seemed to falter, but if you go to climb out of a hole, lift the bucket and turn you'd find that limit. The MF's with better designed hydraulic systems (cough CAT cough) handle it better and are able to multi-function easier. Some aren't as good.
If you feel like you can use all of HP of your current machine and run out of power you'd probably be a little disappointed. The difference is more noticeable on the track machines where they need more turning power and are just heavier in general.
| |
|
Skid loader question... 74 hp?
