Mr Skeptical, go get  0.0000408 oz of liquid and put it on a square inch of cloth and see just how "damp" it is.  And that is acting as if she is two dimensional.  In actual fact due to the third dimension, that minute amount of liquid is actually going to be spread over many square inches of actual clothing.   


There is simply no way that the clothes were damp.   It is possible that with sufficient laboratory analysis it might be possible to detect that they were actually contacted by something, but absolutely no way to get to "damp" where any human could even be able to perceive the moisture.    So, as I said, now this whole discussion is based on a claim which is proven to be exaggerated, embellished, false, unreliable, or whatever politically correct soft language you wish to use to describe untruth.