AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (202) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Trimble RangePointRTX vs Glonass
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Precision TalkMessage format
 
torn
Posted 12/7/2017 21:01 (#6413682 - in reply to #6412906)
Subject: RE: Trimble RangePointRTX vs Glonass


roaming
catmendoo - 12/7/2017 14:48

Yep. Already running RTK and use RTX for steering operations that we don’t want to setup a base station for. Just curious if Glonass adds accuracy. According to torn’s explantion, RTX should be more accurate than adding Glonass.

Careful - I missed the part of your post about tiling.

RangePoint RTX is in no way acceptable for tiling. You need local radio RTK for tiling or anything else requiring vertical accuracy. Some are having success with cellular RTK, but I would recommend radio.

CenterPoint RTX is much better than RangePoint RTX for horizontal applications, but still isn't acceptable for vertical work.

Both RangePoint and CenterPoint RTX signals utilize GLONASS. RTK corrections may or may not utilize GLONASS, depending on the system. If the base station uses GLONASS, then the rover must use GLONASS, and if the base doesn't, the rover must not. It's both or neither.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)