|
| There is a good chance Buck was insinuating that it SHOULD have been Jon Corzine instead of his son. First, Corzine stole OUR MONEY. Now, Corzine is paying his defense team with OUR MONEY. It just throws salt in our wounds. The move to allow him to use that money to defend himself was OKd by the bankruptcy judge. They are a den of thieves, with a lot of them having ties to Goldman Sachs. If it would have been Corzine, instead of his son, it would have saved MF account holders and US taxpayers a lot of money. I would not be surprised to see Corzines defense team use the death of his son as a sympathy tactic to lessen the impact of this case against corzine. Of course its sad but corzine wouldn't give a damn if it was our son.
Edited by buford 3/14/2014 09:37
| |
|
jon corzine's son
