AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (96) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Some report numbers to ponder from MN
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
Buck S
Posted 1/6/2014 23:27 (#3581928 - in reply to #3581837)
Subject: RE: I guess it depends



McLeod County, MN
Tara Farms - 1/6/2014 21:42

on weather I believe crops were as bad last year as so many claimed they were

on a personal level 2012 was way better than 2013

but then when I talked about having a good crop in 2012 I was told that I lived in the land of gumdrops and lollipops

so with that in mind how should I think crops this year were not better than 2012 let alone only one bushel less.




Just put the bull$hat aside for once. We are not talking what everyone else claimed or who accused who of what. We are talking about what USDA claimed last year, and what they claimed this year. From what you saw/heard/experienced is 2013, only 1 BPA off 2012, across the entire state ???

Do you believe them?? Only one bushel and a few hundred thousand acres less?? I could see the acreage, but NO WAY on the BPA.

Edited by Buck S 1/6/2014 23:28
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)