|
| To bad some real scientists were sucked into the Political arena of AGW and charged to get only the results their funders demanded....I am for a cleaner earth and abhor pollution (it is Biblically incorrect and hurts a farmer who makes his living from what God and the Earth provides) But Co2/Air Plantfood is in no way shape or form a pollutant and as it rises the Earth gets greener and food production increases on a per acre basis and uses less water to achieve those results (proved by science). Our yields on the farm have been increasing (especially in Corn) some no doubt caused by improved genetics and genetic engineering and some no doubt from the slightly higher Co2 levels we are enjoying (385PPM up from 310PPM 50 years ago) .......John..
The truth will set you free. Throughout the last 500 million years of Earth's 4.6 billion year history, CO2 levels have ranged between 180 parts per million ("ppm") to 7,000 ppm in our atmosphere and currently stands at only 385 ppm. Our atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen and 1% greenhouse gases ("GHG") and other trace gases. Water vapor is 95% of all GHGs and is responsible for clouds, humidity, rain, sleet and snow. CO2 is a small, but very important contributor to Earth's ecosystem. More Co2 means more food production and better health to the world http://www.plantsneedco2.org/default.aspx
http://www.co2isgreen.org/default.aspx?act=newsletter.aspx&newslett...
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/washington-whispers/2009/10/07/scientis...
31,478 scientists decent against Global Warming Alarmists and the Political conceived IPCC and use unadulterated science to back it up.
http://www.climatechangereconsidered.org/
We regret that many advocates in the debate have
chosen to give up debating the science and focus
almost exclusively on questioning the motives of
“skeptics,” name-calling, and ad hominem attacks.
We view this as a sign of desperation on their part,
and a sign that the debate has shifted toward climate
realism.
We hope the present study will help bring reason
and balance back into the debate over climate change,
and by doing so perhaps save the peoples of the world
from the burden of paying for wasteful, unnecessary
energy and environmental policies. We stand ready to
defend the analysis and conclusion in the study that
follows, and to give further advice to policymakers
who are open-minded on this most important topic.
| |
|
Crop improve with C02 Alarmist losing debate
