|
Manitoba, Canada | That's kind of what I'm getting at. I don't think anyone wants to have an environmental spill. I also doubt that anyone from either side of the argument wants to lower their standard of living either. Unfortunately maintaining that standard of living requires energy of some sort. No one yet can create a perfectly safe energy system that is reliable and completely environmentally friendly that delivers the energy we actually consume when we need it. We are left with the issue of trying to find the safest way to supply a source of power across a huge geographical area to where it is needed. Although there are risks involved with pipelines is there actually a safer way? As much as I don't want an environmental accident I can't think of a way of transporting that volume of energy in a safer way. That does not mean I don't care about environmental accidents. That means I don't know of a safer way to transport the energy.
Edited by havin'funfarming 12/6/2016 11:15
| |
|