West of Broken Bow | Bonanza - 10/25/2018 08:16
No, AT&T is worse. Trust me. Only reason I have it is it is a company paid for phone which makes it somewhat bearable...
I only had AT&T in Montana and it was pitiful. Others around me had T Mobile or whatever it’s called. They had decent service even in the hilly areas. I couldn’t get diddly reception unless it was on a holiday or else I drove into the nearest town a long ways away.
Got desperate enough tried climbing a windmill tower and also tall hills to see if any of that would enable my phone to make or receive calls. Didn’t make a darn bit of difference.
Someone said AT&T owns Cricket. I dropped AT&T and went with Cricket. No complaints at all.
Edited by TractorAddict 10/25/2018 22:22
|