|
C IL | I don’t think you understood my post. I agree with you that a skeptic doesn’t take anything on faith. Which my first paragraph above acknowledges.
My second paragraph above addresses the fact that you seem to talk a lot about evidence but neither present nor acknowledge the existence or possibility of any evidence such as scholarly context, however limited you may choose to find it. You just keep defining a skeptic over and over, saying you are interested in discussion but not actually engaging with any intellectual rigor. I’m not sure if you are unwilling or if this whole thing is just disingenuous.
I don’t take issue with your philosophy - you can believe what you want - just your non-rigorous way of applying your own self-described practice of it does not pass rational examination. | |
|
What’s your favorite Bible verses?
