AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (11) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Usda s%#t
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
mfro629
Posted 1/13/2021 06:06 (#8747057)
Subject: Usda s%#t


central illinois
I guess most of us knew they were wrong ... what say
The men who were telling all us simpletons we just don’t understand how good the usda is? It’s frustrating dealing with liars.. a lot of cheap beans sold... yes it looked good at the time like some have mentioned on here... but at what point in time do farmers reject being used as pawns ... I know I’m wasting my time with this post but for Christ sake with the invention of the internet couldn’t someone start a web page where farmers could sign a petition to audit the usda and demand some change... these people work for us .. we actually produce something... think about it without farmers there would be no cbot, ag retailer, implement dealer, seed companies, the list goes on.. was the usda narrative politically motivated? Was it incompetence, arrogance, bureaucracy? I for one would like to hear a few answers...

Frustrating when you have been lied to for several years expecting more lies and sell to soon... I don’t want socialism but this is out of hand... especially with all the technology we have today... in the late 80s early 90s the market might move 10c in a whole year ... it was boring yes can’t we find a middle ground solution
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Deere6
Posted 1/13/2021 06:11 (#8747071 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


SE IL
If everyones bins were full they wouldnt be $14...just saying.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Redshale1
Posted 1/13/2021 06:13 (#8747076 - in reply to #8747071)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Northeastern Pa
Exactly. Nothing left to sell is why we are seeing this price action.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
mfro629
Posted 1/13/2021 06:17 (#8747084 - in reply to #8747076)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


central illinois
So lower yields lower carryout less planted acres have nothing to do with markets hmmmmm I’ll keep that in mind going forward
Top of the page Bottom of the page
frytownfarmer
Posted 1/13/2021 06:40 (#8747136 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t



Frytown, Iowa
Kinda seems to me like they were trying to make Trump look bad to farmers.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Chief Illiniwek
Posted 1/13/2021 06:40 (#8747137 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


West central IL
I can’t believe how many farmers on here speak favorably of the USDA. Just another incompetent government organization. To make matters worse, when they make one of their frequent huge mistakes, they’re loathe to admit it and rather than quickly adjusting numbers, they spread it out over months and even years costing their citizen farmers millions.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Dirk Diggler
Posted 1/13/2021 06:43 (#8747146 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


West Lafayette IN
I think it’s interesting that the Pro Farmer tour estimates are always very close to the USDA estimates and they are both wrong. Is PF just copying the USDA???? It makes me question the value of either one.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
johnny skeptical
Posted 1/13/2021 06:44 (#8747148 - in reply to #8747137)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t



n.c.iowa

What mistake are we accusing them of here exactly?

Top of the page Bottom of the page
philip46702
Posted 1/13/2021 06:44 (#8747151 - in reply to #8747137)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Andrews indiana
+1000
Top of the page Bottom of the page
frytownfarmer
Posted 1/13/2021 06:47 (#8747160 - in reply to #8747146)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t



Frytown, Iowa
Dirk Diggler - 1/13/2021 06:43

I think it’s interesting that the Pro Farmer tour estimates are always very close to the USDA estimates and they are both wrong. Is PF just copying the USDA???? It makes me question the value of either one.


What does it matter to them if they copy or come up with their own. All they care about is their fame and free advertising off the backs of drunk trespassers. You don’t think it was by chance they come out with their results one week after USDA?

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Indrtfmr
Posted 1/13/2021 06:48 (#8747161 - in reply to #8747146)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


NW in.
All they do is try to get close to usda
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ekeller2
Posted 1/13/2021 06:51 (#8747170 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


So. IL
Been saying they were wrong for a while just to get told I’m wrong by members here. I really think the pp numbers from a few years ago were much bigger than advertised and now it’s coming back to bite them.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bigpapa
Posted 1/13/2021 06:54 (#8747177 - in reply to #8747170)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Funny isn’t where are the ones that laughed at you now?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
flyingfarmerNebraska
Posted 1/13/2021 06:57 (#8747181 - in reply to #8747170)
Subject: "pp numbers from a few years ago were much bigger than advertised" DING, we have a winner ekeller2


Nebraska
all the time I spent flying over farmland in the US I said time and time again "they are full of poo with those numbers".

Eventually those little birdies come home to roost. They had to eventually get bled into the system. By a confluence of events, they are having their hands forced and now having to make up for it.

Which is why I still have full bins.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
tc806
Posted 1/13/2021 06:58 (#8747183 - in reply to #8747148)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Casey IL. ( I -70 ) then south on rt.49
The only one I can think of is 2019. They counted ppp ground in there report.
We all new that ppp ground was none productive.
Yes I agree we need them, we also need them to be honest.
Why are there information 30 days old, this is the age of technology.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
DaveSD
Posted 1/13/2021 07:03 (#8747194 - in reply to #8747170)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


north central SD
Doesn't USDA have access to FSA pp numbers, or are they locked up somewhere - top secret?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ScottL
Posted 1/13/2021 07:06 (#8747198 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Amenia, ND
They are just using all the RMA data now to adjust their incompetence 22 million pp 2019 10 million pp 2020. Record yields from late planting 2019 less than ideal yields in 2020. You only need to be in government to screw up things and get away with it. This has cost taxpayers a bundle and producers as well. I have been hauled to the wood shed the last two years for someone’s game of lies and deceit. Why did China buy so much grain Tuesday Am? I have always said there’s someone or entity that runs this corrupt government. I just never thought it was this bad or corrupt. My prayer is Lord Jesus remove the scales from our eyes and open our ears and hearts to understand what is all going on.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
w1891
Posted 1/13/2021 07:06 (#8747199 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


S Illinois
Many may want to think through what they are saying. IN555’s acres numbers are useless because all of the sudden we have a 13.5 demand base instead of 14.5 because this is just “making” up for previous years. And how about the extra demand because UDSA “kept” prices too low? Demand at 3.50 is much different than 4.50 or 5. So now the US demand base is only 13b bu. after accounting for the fudging of the numbers.

May want to sell as much new crop as possible.

Edit: I assume you have you own set of numbers you are going off of? If the USDA was wrong before the report yesterday is also wrong.


Edited by w1891 1/13/2021 07:08
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bonpas
Posted 1/13/2021 07:07 (#8747201 - in reply to #8747181)
Subject: What will you do with the landfall?


SEIL
Land? More bins? Liquor and women? Vacations?

Well played
Top of the page Bottom of the page
flyingfarmerNebraska
Posted 1/13/2021 07:23 (#8747248 - in reply to #8747201)
Subject: save and invest. Don't want more land, got enough bins, don't drink and one wife is plenty :-)


Nebraska
only thing I would consider is a newer airplane as my little bugkiller is getting close to TBO.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
IN555
Posted 1/13/2021 07:39 (#8747297 - in reply to #8747199)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


NW Indiana
I was simply using current demand numbers. I agree they are likely lower at current price but I wouldn't have guessed them to be this high now so why guess wrong again?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlatlandAgII
Posted 1/13/2021 07:46 (#8747309 - in reply to #8747136)
Subject: Tin foil hat time I see


So here's a thought , Trump puts out these super bullish numbers after he loses election , pushing prices up to these very high levels , knowing full well that later it will be corrected and prices fall and Biden gets all the blame .

You see there is never to many conspericy theories.

Edited by FlatlandAgII 1/13/2021 07:51
Top of the page Bottom of the page
AVP_Matt
Posted 1/13/2021 07:54 (#8747329 - in reply to #8747137)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Hennepin, IL
So every mistake they make costs us? What if they're too low on production and too high on usage right now? Would you rather them come out in Feb with the entire correction or spread it out over a few months? When the derecho came thru, would you rather them over shoot the damage and then have to walk those numbers back in the middle of harvest pressure?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
frytownfarmer
Posted 1/13/2021 08:15 (#8747390 - in reply to #8747309)
Subject: RE: Tin foil hat time I see



Frytown, Iowa
FlatlandAgII - 1/13/2021 07:46

So here's a thought , Trump puts out these super bullish numbers after he loses election , pushing prices up to these very high levels , knowing full well that later it will be corrected and prices fall and Biden gets all the blame .

You see there is never to many conspericy theories.


It’s not a conspiracy theory if it correlates to reality

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Palmtopper
Posted 1/13/2021 08:26 (#8747426 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


SE Iowa
What are you comparing right/wrong with?

next month they will be accused of being wrong again... the beat goes on.... the market knows..
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Palmtopper
Posted 1/13/2021 08:31 (#8747451 - in reply to #8747199)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


SE Iowa
Agree... more bad things can happen at these levels than good...Trickling new crop... but this still could be a 2022 problem too... what to do.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
McFarmer
Posted 1/13/2021 09:17 (#8747571 - in reply to #8747390)
Subject: RE: Tin foil hat time I see


frytownfarmer - 1/13/2021 08:15

FlatlandAgII - 1/13/2021 07:46

So here's a thought , Trump puts out these super bullish numbers after he loses election , pushing prices up to these very high levels , knowing full well that later it will be corrected and prices fall and Biden gets all the blame .

You see there is never to many conspericy theories.


It’s not a conspiracy theory if it correlates to reality



Correlation is not causation.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Spanman
Posted 1/13/2021 09:47 (#8747642 - in reply to #8747426)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


People would rather blame someone else for their poor marketing. It’s evident who sold way too early and won’t let go of that fact.

People were blaming Trump for marketing issues as short as a few months ago instead of taking responsibility to mitigate risk. Own it. Analyze what was done wrong. Move on. Imo. Just sayin
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Palmtopper
Posted 1/13/2021 10:15 (#8747693 - in reply to #8747642)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


SE Iowa
or really didnt believe their own aurguement in the first place... or they would of reowned some how... the market was telling them too.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ekeller2
Posted 1/13/2021 11:44 (#8747903 - in reply to #8747642)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


So. IL
Spanman - 1/13/2021 09:47

People would rather blame someone else for their poor marketing. It’s evident who sold way too early and won’t let go of that fact.

People were blaming Trump for marketing issues as short as a few months ago instead of taking responsibility to mitigate risk. Own it. Analyze what was done wrong. Move on. Imo. Just sayin


When it’s a game of lies from the government making fake numbers then yes we should blame them. They keep printing higher numbers every year and then they won’t come off them much to save face even when they know they are wrong. Their lies have cost farmers billions.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
biggens_ia
Posted 1/13/2021 12:18 (#8747981 - in reply to #8747057)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


so you knew they were wrong, you wrote it here. In KNOWING that info what actions did u take to capitalize on it?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Spanman
Posted 1/13/2021 13:33 (#8748163 - in reply to #8747903)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


Or made farmers billions if you knew they were wrong. Would we be this high if they were always exactly correct? I would guess we wouldn’t be close to this price but that’s just my opinion. Sort of a butterfly effect.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
steigertiger
Posted 1/13/2021 16:19 (#8748448 - in reply to #8747136)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


E ND
well, trump gave us the payments, and a price. good times for farmers, but he is done on the 20th, and we move on from there. a cheap dollar could keep us in the game. a recession has usually been good for ag.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Indrtfmr
Posted 1/13/2021 16:49 (#8748512 - in reply to #8747981)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


NW in.
The problem is you were right but who can stand and fight for two years or more of fake numbers. You can't outspend the government and the way markets are set up. How much money would you have to spend to defend your correct position. It costs a fortune to fight the government.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ekeller2
Posted 1/13/2021 19:46 (#8748990 - in reply to #8748512)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


So. IL
Indrtfmr - 1/13/2021 16:49

The problem is you were right but who can stand and fight for two years or more of fake numbers. You can't outspend the government and the way markets are set up. How much money would you have to spend to defend your correct position. It costs a fortune to fight the government.


Yes and you can only hold corn so long before the bin goes out of condition.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Spanman
Posted 1/13/2021 23:10 (#8749560 - in reply to #8748990)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


I know plenty of people selling 19 corn and beans. Heck someone posted about selling 18 beans here the other day.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ekeller2
Posted 1/14/2021 06:43 (#8749767 - in reply to #8749560)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


So. IL
Spanman - 1/13/2021 23:10

I know plenty of people selling 19 corn and beans. Heck someone posted about selling 18 beans here the other day.


My neighbor tried that, after discounts it wasn't paying any better this year than he could have got last year. Corn just don't keep multi years here.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Palmtopper
Posted 1/14/2021 09:23 (#8750170 - in reply to #8747903)
Subject: RE: Usda s%#t


SE Iowa
If you really believe their track record you should of done something instead of complaining....my guess you really dont.

Btw..What are comparing right/wrong too?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)