Lenders, I appreciate your response, even including marking up a picture. I still do not see this as an insurmountable problem. A few of the combine guys I used to work with would have a working, reasonable cost, and safe spreader on that machine pretty quick. Maybe even without a 3-D computer model. If we look at this as a major problem how did we put men on the moon? Maybe everyone who used to solve these kinds of problems has been "early retired" out? Thanks for the comments even though I don't accept your conclusion. If you look at the man hours and units of nitrogen fertilizer those windrows waste there seems like an economic incentive to correct the problem/spread the windrow also. Jim at Dawn question: what does "OAC '04" stand for?
Edited by Jim 6/23/2009 15:01
|