|
KS | Thank you Plowboy for saying, there is always another side of the story. In this
> > case there is. The landowner referenced in this post contacted the "new
> > tenant" in the fall of 2006, summer of 2007, and during 2008 to see if
> > they would be interested in farming this land as they were unhappy with
> > the "old tenant" There was never an offer made for the property in
> > question until the fall of 2008 when the landlord made it clear they were
> > going to change. In the fall of 07 the "old tenant" had actually gotten a
> > different farm away from the "new tenant" so it wouldn't be a hard
> > decision for them to make on any basis of loyalty. I know for a fact that
> > the new farmers have not gone out to seek new land and have only listened
> > to people when called. Their are a lot of people on this site that only
> > see one side of a story, then condemn the other side without hearing it.
> > It really gets quite comical doesn't it. Like Don say's from below "Not all
decisions are based on monetary reward"
| |
|
Does Loyalty matter anymore?
