AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

strip till fertilizer savings??
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Crop TalkMessage format
 
easymoney
Posted 12/26/2015 18:07 (#4988667 - in reply to #4985695)
Subject: RE: strip till fertilizer savings??


ecmn
Norstman - 12/25/2015 08:56

easymoney - 12/25/2015 07:36

I have 6500$ into my strip till rig, for a few hundred dollars I could have it running variable rate. just need to get more grid sampling done.

the university's have 20 years of history showing how banded fertility is more efficient.

I will let you know how its going the next time I soil test.

with a broadcaster you spread 100 lbs to the acre, but each row has a 10" root zone, so there is 10" between 2 rows on every acre that is getting fertilized but nothing is growing there.

with a band you put 50 lbs under the plant right in the rot zone.

on 3 dollar corn if I can cut big money from my fertilizer budget and still get the same yields how do I not do it.

better get used to banding fertility now. wont be long and the gov. will ban the use of broadcasters.



By banding only half the amount wouldn't you still be mining the soil? I have never understood the "you better do it the way I am because the government is going to ban it soon" mentality. I doubt broadcasting will be banned. I heard the same argument from my neighbor when I bought a nh3 bar. He claimed it would be a big paper weight because nh3 was going to be banned the next year.


I have room to mine for some time.

you aren't using all you broadcast. a lot of what you broadcast doesn't make it to the root zone for this year.

its about efficiency. our soils don't have much to spare, if we didn't spread P and K and Lime the soils will go down hill very fast. if I can apply 50% and maintain soils then what am I out?

for our ground the recommended rate of broadcast for 150 bu. corn is 100 p and 120 K. there are years were we don't get 150 bu. I have been applying by recommended rates and soils have been gaining. so in my math it makes sense to use reduced rates banded.


I don't see how its a big debate??? the theory of strip till to reduce hp and equipment cost per acre is a valid one. the theory of banded vs broadcast at a reduced rate has been tested for 20 years at the universitys.

some soils have more nutrients in them and some don't. some soils will go very well with reduced rates and some might not. farms are very different and so are the operators.

as far as the laws go, in the state of Mn. I would be surprised if broadcasters are in use in 10 years. wouldn't be shocked if we had to have a permit to buy fertilizer and could only buy what university recommendations say with your soil tests.


Edited by easymoney 12/26/2015 18:08
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)