Viewing a thread - Why current farmland values are well supported

Forums | Classifieds (77) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Why current farmland values are well supported	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format

badjaccs

Posted 11/9/2015 08:31 (#4885985 - in reply to #4885390)
Subject: RE: Why current farmland values are well supported

Missouri

We fought a school bond in my district last year. In this school district and the county in general Agriculture land pays for 83% of all taxes, the towns and businesses pay the balance. By the way we are about 12% of the population of this county. 12% are paying 83% of all local taxes.

Edited by badjaccs 11/9/2015 08:32

Why current farmland values are well supported - coup : 11/8/2015 20:15
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - ehoff : 11/8/2015 20:54
  - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - Wheat77 : 11/8/2015 21:06
    - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - sed : 11/8/2015 21:41
      - +1 - happyfarmer : 11/8/2015 21:45
      - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - badjaccs : 11/9/2015 08:21
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - sed : 11/8/2015 20:57
  - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - pknoeber : 11/8/2015 21:05
    - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - sed : 11/8/2015 21:15
      - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - pknoeber : 11/8/2015 21:36
        
        RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - sed : 11/8/2015 21:46
    - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - badjaccs : 11/9/2015 08:31
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - JC STONE : 11/8/2015 21:09
  - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - sed : 11/8/2015 21:21
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - cornbore : 11/8/2015 21:12
  - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - tmrand : 11/8/2015 21:32
    - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - bp1111 : 11/10/2015 22:02
      - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - tmrand : 11/11/2015 06:17
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - 00rooster : 11/8/2015 23:18
- RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - cows-n-crops : 11/8/2015 23:49
  - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - GrainTrader : 11/9/2015 00:34
    - Krondratiev Wave theory - redoak : 11/9/2015 05:23
      - RE: Krondratiev Wave theory - cornbore : 11/9/2015 06:30
        
        RE: Krondratiev Wave theory - mjl : 11/9/2015 06:40
    - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - mcfarm : 11/9/2015 05:24
  - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - coup : 11/9/2015 06:33
    - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - Tiler : 11/9/2015 06:58
    - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - Clay SEIA : 11/9/2015 07:46
    - RE: Is there a 50 year cycle? - redoak : 11/9/2015 11:48
  - RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - Pat H : 11/9/2015 07:12
    - RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - Brandon SWIA : 11/9/2015 07:49
      - RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - cornbore : 11/9/2015 08:08
        
        RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - GrainTrader : 11/9/2015 12:18
        
        RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - cornbore : 11/9/2015 12:42
        RE: Cycles work when there isn't 'fundamental change" - Brandon SWIA : 11/9/2015 12:44
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - Bert : 11/9/2015 13:15
  - RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - runnin_on_empty : 11/9/2015 21:23
- RE: Why current farmland values are well supported - farmdreamz : 11/10/2015 20:30

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)