Viewing a thread - More now vs. then

Forums | Classifieds (56) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

More now vs. then	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format

KevinM

Posted 11/8/2015 20:13 (#4885246 - in reply to #4885226)
Subject: RE: Doesn't that assume.

SE IL

coup - 11/8/2015 20:06

When looking back @ land values from 1970- 2015. Current ave farmland price are the most undervalued vs the capitalized value since 1970. These two values will come together @ some point, either by higher land prices, lower rents, higher int rates or a combination of the three. Capitalized farm value is about 35% higher than ave farmland price, way things currently look.

Maybe that's accounting for income taxes?

More now vs. then - tab : 11/7/2015 21:22
- RE: More now vs. then - emtbd1979 : 11/7/2015 21:50
  - RE: More now vs. then - tab : 11/7/2015 22:11
    - RE: More now vs. then - emtbd1979 : 11/7/2015 22:29
      - RE: More now vs. then - Brandon SWIA : 11/7/2015 23:09
        
        RE: More now vs. then - emtbd1979 : 11/7/2015 23:20
      - RE: More now vs. then - tab : 11/8/2015 04:14
    - RE: More now vs. then - 1466driver : 11/7/2015 22:42
      - RE: More now vs. then - Clay SEIA : 11/7/2015 23:02
        
        RE: More now vs. then - tab : 11/8/2015 04:18
        
        Dollars today are unbelieveable - redoak : 11/8/2015 06:04
        RE: More now vs. then - coup : 11/8/2015 06:07
        
        RE: More now vs. then - Badger : 11/8/2015 07:07
        
        RE: More now vs. then - tab : 11/8/2015 07:19
        
        RE: More now vs. then - farmdreamz : 11/11/2015 05:01
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - 1234 : 11/8/2015 06:14
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - Brandon SWIA : 11/8/2015 06:19
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - coup : 11/8/2015 06:32
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - pknoeber : 11/8/2015 06:52
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - coup : 11/8/2015 20:06
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - KevinM : 11/8/2015 20:13
        
        RE: Doesn't that assume. - tab : 11/8/2015 07:21
        
        RE: More now vs. then - JC STONE : 11/8/2015 07:58
- RE: More now vs. then - old boy : 11/8/2015 06:36
- RE: More now vs. then - STOMN : 11/8/2015 06:50
  - RE: More now vs. then - Ih smoke : 11/8/2015 07:11
    - RE: More now vs. then - tmrand : 11/8/2015 07:24
- RE: Deffered tax liability is.... - CRJ : 11/8/2015 07:28
- RE: More now vs. then - Jackrabbit : 11/8/2015 07:44
  - RE: More now vs. then - mjl : 11/8/2015 08:25
    - RE: More now vs. then - yathink : 11/8/2015 08:36
    - RE: More now vs. then - Ih smoke : 11/8/2015 09:14
      - RE: More now vs. then - emtbd1979 : 11/8/2015 09:32
        
        RE: More now vs. then - 1586 : 11/8/2015 09:49
        
        RE: More now vs. then - Ih smoke : 11/8/2015 09:58
        1586 - twinpines : 11/8/2015 10:59
        
        RE: 1586 - mjl : 11/8/2015 11:15
        
        RE: 1586 - emtbd1979 : 11/8/2015 11:59
        
        RE: 1586 - mjl : 11/8/2015 14:53
        
        RE: 1586 - cows-n-crops : 11/8/2015 15:39
    - RE: More now vs. then - mjl : 11/8/2015 09:29
      - RE: More now vs. then - badjaccs : 11/8/2015 11:50
        
        RE: More now vs. then - Newguy : 11/8/2015 13:05
    - RE: More now vs. then - JC STONE : 11/8/2015 17:00

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)