AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (44) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Lexion 740 vs. Case 7230
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
9700
Posted 7/7/2014 22:34 (#3956681 - in reply to #3955234)
Subject: RE: Lexion 740 vs. Case 7230


Ah, I was hoping someone would pipe up with the 'look at all the moving parts' argument. My friend, EVERY part on a combine is a moving part - so all of those steel hydraulic lines that 'appear' to be fool-proof and stationary are, in fact, moving parts, and as such, are subject to fatigue, vibration, and yes, failure - no different than (gasp), a belt and pulley. One is easy to troubleshoot and renew, the other much less so. Now, let us discuss reliability and longevity/durability. Reliability is something that can be measured across a machine population as an MTBF, a mean time between failures. Durability or longevity, then, is more a measure of the number of hours or better, bushels/acres of crop that particular components on machines last before requiring replacement (things like feeder chains, augers, concaves, rasp bars, elevator chains, etc.). Nope, longevity still goes to the Claas here.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)