| OntarioCanuck - 6/23/2014 13:43
When they make outrageous claims they need good evidence to back it up otherwise their 'report' is just more paper to recycle.
As I read it, their only claim is that there is 60% more autism near pesticide areas.
It's more a hint to do further research in that direction, because it is a real statistical anomaly.
The suggestion (not claim) that a pesticide drift could have affected the mothers sounds a bit bull though, but I am no biologist.
These geomap applications make me wonder what will come next, will anybody be able to see and identify every person we met at a given time from high resolution satellites, or reconstruct our commute or everywhere we went during our whole life?
Edited by Chimel 6/25/2014 20:15
|