...this study sure has a lot of assumptions.  Specifically, they stated they never measured any actual pesticide presence--they just looked at the maps and assumed presence.  Uh?  My conclusion is this study is merely a good example of "All studies are wrong.  Some studies are useful."  This one isn't even useful.

  My belief that this study is worthless says nothing about whether or not actual exposure to any substance affects childhood development. I dunno, but this study just makes for an excuse for some ignorant journalist to write a slanted piece with the usual prejudices.  

Take care.  Stetts