I never really put a lot of thought into the AIM thing until it was brought up to me a while back. Essentially it does just the opposite of what we are trying to achieve. We are all looking for better coverage meaning you need finer droplets of water. Exactly the opposite of what you get with AIM. Money is probably better spent on an injection system to use a drift retardant around the outside of fields.

As far as lower rates and resistance. If you think lower rates didn't help accelerate resistance you need to take some science classes.