|
Missouri | I would be interested to know what the surevacs draw.
You're right, your worst case test should not happen during autoswath, but it will happen anytime you shut off via master, or implement switch, which isn't the majority of the time, but does still occur.
I haven't configured a DirectCommand + SeedCommand setup yet, but I would think if your SureVacs need more lead time, that can also be addressed with Autoswath look ahead timings. This has the advantage of allowing the on and the off to be adjusted independently. A tongue length offset will affect both operations (which may/may not be desirable dependent upon circumstances). There's multiple good ways to adjust these, and as long as you check the results of your settings, you know you have a good config. Does a dual config like this let you set different implement offsets for the seed and the liquid?
I try (this is just a personal preference) to make time delay related adjustments with look ahead timings, and dimensional related changes with offsets. Something I have wanted to do for a long time, but never had the time or opportunity, was to check a system twice. Once traveling into autoswath at typical field speeds, and once traveling an a tremendously low rate of speed, and compare the results. The very slow rate of speed test negates any effect of any look ahead timings, and would let one nail the offset dimensions down exactly right, and then the at field speed test could dial in timings for delay related reasons. It's just an idea, but I think, in theory, this could give the most accurate performance at all ranges of speeds. It's just a wild idea I've had, most people don't care for such overthinking on a subject, but I get the impression you might have interesting insights into such an idea. I would like to know what you think. | |
|