AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (30) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Square vs. rectangle? Tube bridge physics.
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
Alberta Farmer
Posted 2/23/2013 00:53 (#2919487 - in reply to #2919457)
Subject: Re: Square vs. rectangle? Tube bridge physics.



West Central Alberta Coldest, wettest edge

The distance between the top and bottom plates will gain you the most( by memory, I think the distance relationship is squared,whereas increases in area have no multiplier, 1 to 1), but since you are keeping that constant, and only increasing the width, you will still get more strength from the 12" wide. It will take 1.5 times more effort to stretch the bottom flange, and 1.5 times more effort to compress the top flange, due to the increased area over the 8". Which is exactly what Exit is referring to regarding mass moment of inertia.

Image is of an I beam, but the principle is the same( in the up and down direction), just have two webs instead of one.  The formula at the bottom, I subscript X, is the one you would use, since the webs (verticals)are constant, regardless of width, you don't even need to calculate that, if all you want to do is compare.  A bigger moment, means stronger in that direction.



Edited by Alberta Farmer 2/23/2013 01:00




(area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg (70KB - 915 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)