|
cropsey, il 61731 | The difference between using google and AI is I select from what google returns. I can filter out obvious nonsense (like it's a 150 bu cart). Since the 70's it's always been GIGO when it comes to computing and will never change. AI doesn't restrict its learning to known factual sources (figuring that out is another problem) but uses the total internet and it's "guess" (it assumed the model number indicated the capacity but incorrectly).
The internet, in general, is a dangerous place for information. Even without the help of AI, just watch exercise or supplement experts go from this exercise or supplement will fix you to they both cause cancer. So, I tend to prefer actual people's personal experience, They could have done something wrong, but at least you can ask more questions and they know what they did. It's tedious but it beats buying a sensor because AI said this 7088 combine error code definitely meant one thing when it was totally wrong. I believe it decided error codes are error codes so a code for a dodge van was equally valid.
AI, like global warming er..., climate change, have been marketed intensely. All those folks that went to UofI but attended classes south of green street (when they did) did not end up on skid row as I thought. Those marketing majors always were pretty good at lying and now they get paid well for it. It distorts the market, but is great for 401K's (maybe the ultimate purpose?)
Anyway, using AI to generate videos of cats with rocket launchers is what it does best. ....and yes I know my cats can't use anything larger than a glock. | |
|
Google AI Learns
