|
| I think the poison air comment was made by NEIAAG in reference to beans rather than corn but since this thread is about corn and since I don’t really care about beans, I’ll share the corn part of what NEIAAG was sharing as well.
Not trying to put words in his mouth. I don’t understand it very well at all so I will have some things wrong below. He seems to have left so I’m just attempting to answer your question somewhat.
Anyway, at the time all of this was going on (Jan of 26), NEIAAG was very strongly warning the NAT community about $3.07 or so corn in 2026 and sub 9 dollar beans (I actually thought he said sub $8 beans but I don’t follow beans and I could be remembering wrong).
Anyway, he uses a bunch more stuff than this but his basic premise was:
1. In April of 2020 a major low was made. This is likely the A point of the next major Andrews fork on the corn chart
2. In April of 2022 a major high was made. This is likely the B point of the next major Andrews fork on the continuous corn chart. The big question then becomes, “where is the C point?”
3. It’s possible that late July of 2024 is the C point. If so we would expect price to make steady “higher highs” from there and steady “higher lows” from there
4. Price made a minor “higher high” in Feb of 2025.
5. Price made a “higher low” (barely) in August of 25
6. In Dec 25 through Jan 25, price was putting in what appeared to be a top. A “lower high”. If #3 above was truly the C point, we should not be seeing lower highs. I think NEIAAG was saying to himself, “this means we are still looking for the C point”. July of 2024 was not the real C point in his mind because price was not acting strong enough for July of 24 to have been the C point.
7. So he measured how low he thought price would go based upon its failure to make a new high. He drew a line from the headfake C in late July of 2024 to the next low in late July of 2025 (each circled in red on my chart). He drew a parallel line at the failure of price to make a new high in Dec 25/Jan 26 (circled in yellow on my chart). Then he made another parallel line an equal distance below the first line to measure how low price would go. That is how he came up with ~$3.07.
Since that time, we have gone higher than where we were but we still have not made a higher high. Price is still acting weak (maybe not relative to “today” but definitely relative to major price structure). My guess is that NEIAAG is still thinking we have not found the C point and believes that because of this recent rally the C point will be even lower than he initially thought.
About to upload my chart. Might be pretty low resolution and may be useless for that reason. We’ll see what NAT does to it.
Edited by dpilot83 4/28/2026 08:05
 (IMG_4071 (full).jpeg)
Attachments
----------------
 IMG_4071 (full).jpeg (47KB - 12 downloads)
| |
|
The Chart
