AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

US Naval blockade of strait
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
havin’funfarming
Posted 4/13/2026 11:09 (#11616822 - in reply to #11616627)
Subject: RE: US Naval blockade of strait


Pofarmer - 4/13/2026 08:26

Good Lord you people. 

havin’funfarming - 4/13/2026 07:00 A person doesn’t have to be involved in politics to be a Democrat. You guys were claiming we don’t think he is an elite. You guys were claiming he is “one of them”. I am looking out that he is an elite and that he was a Democrat

He was a Democrat in the same way that I'm a Democrat at this point. He wasn't a politican or someone who had any affect on policy. He was just a guy who said he was a Democrat. When he ran for office? He ran as a Republican. Maybe he just said he was a Democrat when he thought that Democrats had power? 

.

 You were bringing up Trumps failures at business and now you have a problem with his son’s success.

Because his son's "success" at this point looks an awful lot like Nepotistic grifting by buying large shares of companies about to get large Govt contracts. 

 You ignore the Pelosi’s on your side and pretend this type of thing is something new.
 

If you look at Pelosi's portfolio, it's all typical investments in the stock market. Large Tech stocks, Amazon, NVIDIA, etc, etc. It's not like Paul Pelosi suddenly invested in some little startup about to get a billion dollar Govt contract. There's a marked difference. 

The covid fiasco was likely the biggest wealth transfer from the average working Joe to the elite in history and it was brought to you curtesy of the swamp, not covid. Some members of the public still praise those who advised the government and who also just happened to also be the biggest recipients of that grift.
 

That would be the idiocy of Trumps tax cuts. But, whatever. 

You think you are discovering something new. The truth is that it was happening before too. It is quite likely that you argued against others who were trying to tell you it was happening. Now I’ll go down a road I have so often on this site. I am quite certain that there is money being made because of ties to the Trump administration. I am quite certain that it happened with the previous administration also I am quite certain that it happened with every administration. I am quite certain that it is not a new phenomenon. I am quite certain that the past grifting was at levels higher than we know about and thus it is impossible to know that it is higher than it ever has been in the past. Are you able to admit that you also do not know?

It would be pretty easy. 

Show it. 

The problem is, you can't.



I have no idea why you have an issue with me saying he used to be a Democrat. I never said he was involved in politics. I did say that he chummed around with them in the past and they generally accepted him. Likely because he supported them financially as that is how that tends to work. There seems to be a little play of some sort playing out in your head because you are stuck in a bit of a rut on that subject.

I don’t have a problem with you pointing out the grifting now. You however, do seem to have a problem with me pointing out the grifting during the previous administration. That unfortunately is pretty much a normal pattern of behaviours. You are literally making excuses for Pelosi’s grifting. It wasn’t normal business practices. Any differences in financial gains are due to the ability to capitalize on it, not intent nor morals.

And don't forget Fauci and Gates. They made out like bandits as did many others at the top end of the pharma industries.

There is every indication at this point that is you who selectively chooses to overlook that type of behaviour while accusing me of doing that. There is ample evidence of the grifting that happened in the past but you obviously are choosing to ignore it. Projection once again on your part. lol

I was right when I said I was going down a road where the pattern will repeat. lol. It would be a waste of time to provide proof of past grifting during the last administration because you have already gone down the road of making excuses for it. That pattern that would just repeat. You would not accept any numbers I provided, you would make more excuses for their amazing profits, and you would not accept anything as proof unless it came from pofarmer approved sources. Hehe


Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)