|
NE Ohio | I'm not sure I get the mentality on agtalk for land. It's an appreciating asset, so the idea that land itself will cash flow is odd. You don't buy gold expecting it to cash flow, you buy expecting it to appreciate. It's the same with land. I realize it's a fundamental requirement to be able to farm, but if the land paid for itself 100% with the revenue generated from it, every farmer should buy anything they can. In reality, it's an input, just like anything else, except that input has a (hopefully) appreciating residual value. I think of this as just a cash-flow game and can you generate enough revenue to float the note?
Edited by 87yj 3/8/2026 21:40
| |
|