|
ecmn | Deficiency and probability are not in dispute. Everybody agrees that if a plant or soil test is deficient there is a probability of a yield response.
Show the data of soil test and plant test are directly correlated to yield
Show the data where an application is directly connected to yield.
If spoon feeding and tissue testing doesn't work, how come every top yield grower follow that system?
Show me the quote from the last thread where anyone said to rely on a single R1 test or push nutrients at R1. Nobody said that. You’re arguing with a position nobody held
I’m trying to understand how you have a ‘baseline’ when even the universities don’t claim one. Their ranges are wide because nutrient demand shifts with N, hybrid, soil, and weather. If your baseline only holds when N is high, then it’s not a baseline, it’s conditional
Edited by easymoney 1/19/2026 20:11
| |
|
Corn Tissue Analysis Numbers - Take 2 - Sufficiency @ VT-R1
