|
| In my mind it’s like if you hit silver from 20 bottom to 80 top you got a double at 40 and then a double at 80 and now it has to go to 160 for the next double because it takes as much as the previous gain combined but if you have time to wait you could gamble on say ….oil drillers and start dcaing into them and then after six years, if you picked a low cap solid fundamentals, you could get that same compound of 20 and then 40 and then 80 again. The problem is you get cut short when you sell with taxes. So if you had 20$ and it went to 80 and ur long term capital gains is 25% you’re back at 60 but that could then turn into 240 which wouldn’t be bad but that starts to feel like gambling and would require high conviction and diamond hands.
For land yes I see what you’re saying but seems like stocks double fast when the market cap is low and as they begin to approach 100 billion or 1 trillion say for tech stocks the gains happen but it’s not as rapid because it’s a lot harder for a company to go from 2.5 trillion to 5 trillion than it is for a company to go from 25 billion to 50 billion because it takes increasingly more revenue to double it. Kinda like that wheat example. 1 grain to 2 grains is easy to do. But a trillion grains to 2 trillion is much harder
But thats just like my opinion man
Of course picking lower cap stocks is extremely risky and difficult. I guess that’s why if oil got to 35$ I’d have strong conviction that it would prbly go back up to 70$ within 7 years and maybe even higher and the market caps of the less known and smaller but still fundamentally sound oil companies would have an easy time of doubling
| |
|
Exponential growth and farming
