Viewing a thread - How does the capture of Maduro affect farm markets, fuel price?

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 11:55

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 11:19

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 10:21

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 10:09

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 09:58

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 09:55

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 09:51

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 09:34

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 09:20

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 09:13

havin’funfarming - 1/5/2026 09:02

farmer54 - 1/5/2026 08:50

David - 1/5/2026 08:42

I’ll play your game.

An abortion is wrong in my opinion. It’s an abomination. It’s terrible. A death occurs. Much anguish will occur from it both in the moment and for a lifetime.

But, an abortion can be performed seamlessly in spite of all of that. Doesn’t make it right. Doesn’t make it okay. Doesn’t make it approved. But, one can observe and be told and know that an abortion was performed seamlessly.

And with that, twist away on what I didn’t say.

Thanks for being honest. To me taking a life can never be seamless. Life is precious. We are all made in the image of God. So if you want to bury me or expose me or whatever you want to do, go for it. I have said my peace. This is my belief and this was the whole point of the argument the last 2 days.

If that was your goal it wasn’t effective because your supposed altruistic message was delivered in a very rude and insulting manner. If you truly have the beliefs you just stated, you have stated but not shown them in any way shape or form in these last 2 days. Also, appreciating that there was less deaths than it could have been which clearly the seamless term was used to represent in this case, aligns with the values that you just described.

If you truly are the person with the values that you are trying to tell us you have you owe me an apology for the way you have misrepresented what I said. I actually don’t know if I have ever actually asked anyone to apologize before. I usually just let everyone walk away. But the words used appear to be very important to you so in this case I will ask for a sincere apology. As I said before, I will harbour no hard feelings and all will be forgiven if you can do that.

I will apologize for the tone, but not for the message of what I said. I do stand behind that. Taking life can never be seamless. And yes one life is just as valuable as the 99.

There is no need to apologize for the message you are sending. There is, however, a need to apologize for misunderstanding the message I was saying. It is quite apparent that we have been in agreement all along. The entire last 2 days has been due to you assuming i had said something i had not because you had read something into my message that wasn’t said.

The only thing left in question here is if you are of the character that is capable of admitting that wrong and apologizing for that.

We have NOT been in agreement all along. Although you may have not said it directly, You have made it very clear that many lives is more important than one. I believe one life is as valuable as many. For that I will not apologize. You said above you have exposed me for who I am. You are correct about that. I hope everyone on Ag talk knows how I feel about one life.

Oh. Ok. If you believe we were not in agreement then you will not have any issue finally answering these questions.

You presented a hypothetical situation that I will base these questions off of.

Option a) My son was killed in the operation that just happened.

Option b) There was a much larger military operation and both my son, your son, and many other people’s sons were killed.

Out of those TWO options which would you prefer and why?

Because people died in both options and you picked one of them does that mean you have no regard for human life?

If you want to show people our beliefs are different you will need to answer these questions.

I choose option C: Neither one died. I choose no military intervention. If you can show me where my answer is not biblically correct, then I would be open to correction.

Perfect. We are still agreement. At least to this point in time it is wrong to say that we aren’t.

Now pick one of two available options and see if our values will still align. And answer the other question also.

I just answered your question. Was I not clear. If a person chooses to kill 1 or 100000000000000, then no he has no regard for human life. Neither one is a good option. If you disagree, please show me in the New Testament where I am wrong.

No you did not answer it. You made up your own answer. The operation had already happened by the time we found out about it. I had no option c to choose from either. I would have also chosen option c if it was available. So we still have the same values up to this point.

Now make your choice from the same options that I had and then answer the additional question. If you can’t then you have not proven that we don’t have the same values because as of right now our values are in alignment. Saying anything else is deceitful. If you want to claim to be a good Christian you need to stop making false claims about my character. That is one of the 10 commandments.

You seem awful entitled to have me answer your questions. I've answered several of your questions. How bout you answer one of mine. Are 99 lives more important than 1 ?

Here is something you have almost certainly failed to realize. I am asking you the same question as you want me to answer.

I am, and have been all along, asking you if option a) one person dying is better than option b) many more people dying. You refuse to answer the same question that you insist I answer.

So now I’ll answer your question like you answered mine. No person dying is better than anyone dying. That represents my values. We have the same values in that regard. I answered your questions to your own standards.

Now that I have answered your question in terms you consider a proper answer it is time for you to answer my questions in terms that I consider a proper answer.

Here they are again:

You presented a hypothetical situation that I will base these questions off of.

Option a) My son was killed in the operation that just happened.

Option b) There was a much larger military operation and both my son, your son, and many other people’s sons were killed.

Edit to add because you will hide behind an option that doesn’t exist again:

There is no option c) no one died.

Out of those TWO options which would you prefer and why?

Because people died in both options and you picked one of them does that mean you have no regard for human life? This event already happened. There IS NO OPTION where people didn’t die.

If you want to show people our beliefs are different you will need to answer these questions.

How does the capture of Maduro affect farm markets, fuel price?	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format