| JC STONE - 12/13/2025 12:31
No worries, its all good. The challenge for me with Andrews is recognizing tbe structure in longer time dimensions (weekly and monthly). If you look at the price action following major monthly highs in soybeans it is rather telling. Timing is key in forecasting them ahead of time however. I'd like to incorporate some Gann timing into the structure to see what could happen.
Not sure if there is enough energy in beans currently to take us to 8. I'd like to see a higher high in blowoff top fashion.
Don't you think the C pivot in corn was struck in August of 24?
Others have said that however, I don't use timing and honestly don't need to. It probably a benefit, but honestly everything you need to know in regards to timing is in price. Nothing more is needed.
I suspect that there maybe another attempt in both corn and beans at the recent high. Or at least I have some more energy to expend. Whether it be vertically or horizonally, I can't say for sure. Failures up there and you are accepting unneccessary risk IMHO.
Its the land of sloped lines and expression of energy. Price changes with time. If I only had a dollar for everytime I drew something and said "No way that can happen" - then watched it do it! Even retesting the 930 level would be painful enough and is still a long long ways from here. Beans do not have a failed swing below so it doesn't have the magnetic attraction to test 8 like corn - but tests below 8.50 would certainly not be unsual in this type of formation. The 8 dollar level barely had enough energy to make new highs last time after a much larger pullback period. So at best - it was a weak - I am running out of gas - attempt for price. I wouldn't be suprised at all by it.
No. It is very very unlikely that August 24 was the low I am looking for. Most pivots are in extremes. A few wont and get express the energy horizontally. If we would happen to test the 370 level in an horizontal fashion and hold then, that would open the door to the failed swing up at 5.20 and horizontal C pivots. I do not see the structure that would support that at this time and it should be there. That said - I may be blinded by bias and not seeing clearly as well.
Take care |
Corn and Beans - There's reasons to be vigilant
