|
| The most irritating problem with AI videos on the tubes, is that they presented as factual, when they are made up stories. They also say the same thing, vaguely, multiple times, along with irrelevant information, and are worse at getting to the point than a women. I guess they think they will make more money with a long drawn out story so they get more view time. It's amazing how many videos there are about how everyone thinks the foreigner in North Dakota that build his house differently is made fun of by the other settlers, but he used half the wood everyone else used in the unexpected blizzard, while he had a comfortable cabin when everyone else was freezing with roaring fires and using up all of their wood by mid winter. Then there is the mechanic or pilot or soldier that modified the equipment braking the air force or army rules, risking court martial if caught, but saved the day and so the commanders recognized their genius and the changes were made the standard. And of course there are the stories of the person that saved a poor abandoned animal, or the wild animals that came to people and led them back to its cub or calf that needed the humans help or it would die. Sometimes they use stock footage of different animals to tell the story, and other times they create the picture to match the story. Some are easy to spot, like when animals have an extra leg or foot, but they seem to be getting more realistic. | |
|
AI threatened Youtube channels
