Northeast, Nebraska | LPaulson7 - 10/23/2025  07:32  
  
Ive tried plenty of biologicals with little to no difference...the ones that have worked do not work every year or in different weather conditions. Yes I see universities are testing biologicals too, but with the same results I've been seeing. Just because it works one year doesn't mean its a good product, needs to be repeatable every year to justify spending the money on it.  
  
When data is hidden behind a pay wall it means that theres a scheme in it. If it was a company actually pushing its product they would give the data out willingly if it all worked as advertised. The fact that you have to pay just to see the data is fleecing more money because whoever's product it is knows it doesn't work.   
  
You soil sample for nutrients to tell you which fertilizer and rate to apply, why don't you soil sample for biology to see what biology you need to apply? Maybe the biological you used isn't what you are lacking in your soil? There are tons of "biologicals" on the market. From enzymes to living organisms to sugars and whatever else you can dream about applying.  Maybe some of these enzymes aren't working because your soil is lacking the microbes. Mine were, had no idea until I started testing for them. My past farming practices have killed off most of the biology in my soil. Some agronomists say they are still there but soil DNA goes through every particle of that soil sample and is telling us a lot of times, they aren't. Look at the first trials website on corn. Scroll down and look at their soil biology tests. A lot of them are missing or low on biology.  My wife does that soil sampling and I do the biological products. Look at the mycorrhizal fungal numbers, then go to google and type in benefits of mycorrhiza in the soil and see if any of the issues you see in your field could be because of a lack of them. That's usually a good starting point. My contact is good and I am willing to have open conversations with anyone with no expectations. |