|
Sask | I would say any banking cartel that funded the debt based monetary system to allow the massive expansion of military power to enable it to occur. I mean, did the US or NATO ever build a military based on wealth generated in an economy? Or has it all been based on money created out of thin air?
Creating money out of thin air grants the ability to create military power. Who allows the $300T of reported debt, to be created? We can start with the Federal Reserve. Are they a banking business or a public service organization. Isn't the entire purpose of the Federal Reserve to prevent public servants from mismanaging the piggy bank? Yes, it was. How is that working out? So, if the Federal Reserve said the US economy can't support the now +$100T of government debt, and couldn't support the clear path it was taking 20 years ago either, as the Federal Reserve should have done - and so said no more borrowing, would the US military still be a +$1T a year operation. Of course it doesn't end at the Fed, we can look at the BIS, IMF and WB to see how they fund things. Isn't that the biggest issue with Ukraine right now, the Federal Reserve must fund Ukraine to carry on its war and has no need to seek settlement as long as the $$$$ are flowing.
It's not very hard to see how wars are operated. But I suppose if you still think mom and pop buying US bonds is enough to support it all - well I can't help you there.
And, if you are going to ask why the banking cartel would even enable it, it is called control. Control of nations via control of the debt and monetary system thus ultimately allowing control of the resources. Debt is not prosperity although everyone thinks it is. Debt is control. And no, you don't need to fly your flag over a country to have power over it
| |
|
So you think its about TARRIFS on China
