|
| False. The only thing that can be logically concluded from what I said is that the Dems did it first because I said they learned it from the Dems. Guilt can not be concluded by my statement. Innocence can not be concluded by my statement. Justification can not be concluded.
What can be concluded by the responses to my statement is that he required proof to believe his side acted in similar fashion. Guilt, innocence, I’m letting him decide. And now you also if you wish.
Edit to add: I will also add that this little argument is a side track argument that developed from his accusations of Christianity being the problem because according to him Christianity is always authoritarian. It’s been an interesting conversation. Lol
Edited by havin’funfarming 10/9/2025 12:56
| |
|
Is this the China you want to buy from
