|
| Well to be perfectly honest we had to run sufficient tests to get to the hypothetical 33% number and until sufficiently tested we can’t know if the alternative offered a 10% or a 66% positive outcome. Only in hindsight will we know what the best treatment is.
Also, as someone else mentioned often both conventional and alternative treatments can be tried at the same time so we don’t know how the various treatments will interact with each other until sufficient testing of combinations has occurred. It is quite possible that the 33% outcome will be increased with some combinations of other alternative methods.
What you are suggesting hypothetically, is to just be content with the current 33% and not try to improve on that. In other words stop cancer research and assume this is the best we can ever achieve. I don’t think that proposal will be accepted by the public.
Edited by havin’funfarming 9/19/2025 22:04
| |
|
Cancer talk questions
