|
| It sounds like the democrats don’t want it released. And of course they use the label of conspiracy theory, just like I said. Lol
“Republicans have lauded the efforts, arguing it will ensure "truth and transparency." But the plan is being blistered by some House Democrats, who warn the initiative is motivated by politics and conspiracy theories.”
The fact that the democrats don’t want it all public indicates that they are lying about what really happened that day.
Why can’t we both be allowed to assume wrongdoing based on the actions of the people involved in a coverup? It works both ways.
Edit to add: Some violence, sure. In a group that size there will almost always be a few that go a bit too far. But we also know that they had government operatives inside that group of protestors. The fact that they don’t release all the footage indicates that it was there operatives that were causing the violence that they then could blame on the true protestors. The fact that they will be blurring some of the faces in the footage they release also supports that because they would be trying to hide the identity of their undercover operatives. It all adds up that way actually.
Edited by havin’funfarming 6/20/2025 06:08
| |
|
Well I guess Illegal isn't illegal if
