AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (50) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Well I guess Illegal isn't illegal if
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
havin’funfarming
Posted 6/19/2025 20:41 (#11268439 - in reply to #11267984)
Subject: RE: Well I guess Illegal isn't illegal if


H3f - 6/19/2025 12:23

"It is also almost a certainty that incidents like you describe are isolated incidents."
The use of blanket rescission of TPS (temporary protected status) demonstrates that it is not isolated incidents.
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/05/12/dhs-terminating-temporary-protec...
"The TPS designation for the country (Afghanistan) expires on May 20, 2025, and the termination will be effective on July 14, 2025."

"Masks were literally the staple of criminals for many years and suddenly they were no longer a concern."
Now masks seem to be a staple of law enforcement along with nothing to indicate law enforcement. That indicates to me that they are arresting or detaining non criminals. If they were targeting criminals I suspect they would have identifying clothing to alleviate the risk of getting shot. Be honest: What is your first thought if a group of masked people suddenly surrounded you? If you had a gun would you use it?

Finally what is the purpose of masks worn by law enforcement? If it is to make it impossible to be identified, the question is WHY? Evidently they are not supplying an identification number either, again WHY?


Who are you to say they are not just still afraid of Covid? Many here still are.

But unfortunately law enforcement hiding their identity and/or what they are doing has been common for a long time now and we have been forced to accept it. I don’t agree with it but it’s reality. They have often disabled security cameras. Thats what they did when they raided Mar-a-Lago. Why did they do that? Am I allowed to assume they were doing what they shouldn’t be doing also? If I did I’d be a conspiracy theorist because I have no proof. Why did they switch out the regular police that were getting along great with the Freedom convoy in Canada to stone cold agents with masks and no badge numbers? Should the peaceful protestors have turned violent when they didn’t know who they were? Why did they release so little footage of Jan 6th? They could have proven all of the violence they claimed against the protestors. Am I allowed to assume that means they are lying about what happened that day?

I understand the reasoning behind your complaint and I don’t like it either. But I’ve been down this road several times already. Claiming what you are now makes you a conspiracy theorist unless you have proof, just like it did when I voiced my concerns. I know how you feel. Everything can indicate guilt just like you say it does but if they are saying they aren’t doing anything wrong and you are still questioning their actions without proof you are just a conspiracy theorist. Welcome to that club.

Edited by havin’funfarming 6/19/2025 20:44
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)