|
| what changed was the original agreement was for an Irrigation ditch across the US forest service land to irrigate the adjoining property ( owned by the Maude Family) to a gun system (without permission ) that was used to irrigate Forest service land that was converted to crop land to a center Pivot irrigation system to better irrigate that converted grazing land for crop production.
so here is what changed according to the articles - YOU have permission to run a irrigation ditch across forest service land to better your property on the other side of forest service land, then converted forest service grazing land to tillable crop land, then put a traveling gun system on to irrigate Maude land and the converted forest service land then again change the irrigation system (without permission) to a center pivot system to make the converted land even more productive.
you don't define who or what "their Property " is Maude or Forest service.
the fact that the Maude family change the complete structure of the lease and the ground over 50 plus years tells me they knew what they were doing was breaking the lease at a minimum and most likely breaking the law. | |
|
Maudes
